In my last post, I wrote about the Baby Einstein refunds. Now Susan McLain, General Manager of Baby Einstein sets the record straight:

For the past several years, Baby Einstein has been under attack by propaganda groups taking extreme positions that try to dictate what parents should do, say and buy. Our philosophy has always been to focus on creating products that parents and babies love, and to not get sidetracked and pulled down into their street fight.Unfortunately, with Susan Linn’s latest stunt, we cannot be silent any longer. Linn’s obvious dislike for Baby Einstein has now turned into a sensational, headline-grabbing publicity campaign that seeks to twist and spin a simple, customer satisfaction action into a false admission of guilt. This is clearly not the case.

Linn’s moves are carefully crafted to prey on parental guilt and uncertainty. This time, she began by asking the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to go after Baby Einstein because, she said, we claimed that Baby Einstein was educational. But we do not make any such claim – and the FTC brought no action.

Not content to rely on the judgment of the federal government, her attacks continued and escalated despite the fact that her assertions have no merit.

That’s where we are today. However, we took a very different approach. We strongly believe that, unlike Linn, our consumers find value in our product, and rather than continue to fight with her, we decided it to leave it up to those consumers. That is why we extended a refund policy that was already in place. Although she would like to claim otherwise, there is nothing extraordinary about a company’s willingness to stand behind its product. To the contrary, it is the strongest possible show of confidence in it.

Baby Einstein announced this offer in a press release issued on September 4, 2009, which was largely ignored by the media. Linn’s latest public relations blitz simply distorts the facts and misleads the public. In the end, this smear campaign has everything to do with Linn trying to generate ink and funding for her cause, and not about the value that consumers find in our product.

Thank you for letting us set the record straight.

Sincerely,

Susan McLain
General Manager, The Baby Einstein Company

Too much ado over cartoons. Isn’t it easier to just turn off the tv if you don’t what’s on it? Diba?

They may have been a great electronic baby sitter, but the unusual refunds appear to be a tacit admission that they did not increase infant intellect.

Earlier today, someone from my twitter network sent this link from the New York Times entitled,  ” No Einstein in Your Crib? Get a Refund” Basically, Disney settled in a class action lawsuit that cited the media behemoth for deceiving parents into believing their kids will turn out to be wunderkinder with the videos.

Yes, count me as one of those that got suckered into believing that classical music could increase IQ points and how Baby Einstein videos would help our kids do better in school.  Of course, as a parent, you’d do anything for your kid  and I won’t let a CD stand in the way of my son and the nobel peace prize for physics!

*Edited: Fixed the New York Times Link

continue reading "Disney Offers Refunds for Baby Einstein Videos"