I’m sorry for being so cryptic with this post last week. I had to keep mum about the details until the issue was resolved. Fortunately things have gotten to a good place right away so that I can finally share with you what happened.
The story:
Noah is mixed fed right now. In addition to my breastmilk, Noah has also been taking NAN HA 2. Last April 9, I went to Robinson’s Commonwealth to buy toiletries for myself when I decided to also buy a can of milk because Noah’s supply is running low. I picked up a can of NAN HA 2, went to the cashier and brought out Noah’s PWD (Person with Disability) ID and booklet. The cashier got Noah’s ID and entered his details in her register. She then showed me the screen and told me
Cashier: “ma’am wala pong discount”.
So I told her
Me: “Oo, walang discount itong mga gamit ko, itong gatas lang”
C: “Ma’am wala po talaga e”
M: “Hindi yan pwede, ang formula kasama sa discount ng mga PWD. Hindi nyo ba pwede i-override yan?”
The cashier then called her supervisor who just showed me the POS screen and told me that there was no way they can change what was in the screen because it was automated.
M: “Hindi ko ito babayaran. Paki void yung transaction”
After this, I called Dan who was waiting for me in the car. I wasn’t really prepared to deal with this. I was only supposed to buy feminine pads for chrissakes but something came over me and I just needed to fight this. What was legally due to my son was being denied by this corporation. It’s not even the discount, which was a measly 5 percent or 50 pesos of the cost of Noah’s milk that mattered, labanan na ito ng prinsipyo.
I talked to the Manager on Duty, with my voice cracking and asked her if what just happened – the non-application of the PWD discount on Nan HW 2 – is store policy or if its a new ruling by the DTI. The manager replied that the reason why the milk was excluded is because it was “stage milk”. I had to pick up my jaw off the floor. I couldn’t believe what I was hearing. The DTI Admin Order lists dairy, fresh and processed milk, and infant formula as being eligible for discounts. NAN HW2 was under all categories. I was trying to understand the rationale the manager gave me but I feared my head would explode. So I asked her if there was a formal written policy of their company that specifies that PWDs are not entitled to their discounts on infant formula. Unfortunately the manager was not able to answer me. I left my name and number with her and stormed off the store.
I was extremely disappointed and I was also fuming mad. So just to check if this policy was just by Robinsons, I went to a nearby Mercury Drug. I got a can of milk, went to the cashier and showed Noah’s ID and booklet. I asked them if the NAN HW2 is eligible for a discount. Without hesitation the cashier said yes. This confirmed that what happened was isolated only to Robinsons and that the exclusion of the discount was not a new ruling by the DTI.
When I got home, I texted my friends and told them what happened. I had to calm down. I tried to sleep off the disappointment but I resolved to write to the company as soon as possible. I had a lot of help from friends who read, re-read and helped me revise the letter. Mahirap magsulat ng emotional for sure and it was great to have friends who reigned in my letter.
So on April 11, I sent this out:
Mr. Jody Gadia
General Manager
Robinsons Supermarket
110 E. Rodriguez Jr. Avenue,
Quezon CityDear Mr. Gadia:
I am Neva Arboleda Santos, a mother to two boys. My youngest, who is only six months old, has Down syndrome and was issued a Person with Disability (PWD) ID card by the Social Services Division of Quezon City Hall last December 2012.
I want to inform you of our unfortunate experience in one of your supermarkets, particularly, the Commonwealth Branch in the afternoon of April 9, 2013. The incident involved your store’s refusal to apply the required 5% discount on my infant son’s milk formula, NAN HW Two.
When I was in line to pay for my son’s milk formula and other sundries, I showed the cashier my son’s PWD ID card which she received. The cashier entered the details of my son’s PWD ID card. She showed me the screen of her POS system and informed me that my son is not eligible for a discount on the infant formula. I was surprised by this since I have been consistently buying my son’s infant formula from other establishments, with the corresponding discount, without any mishap or issue. In fact, right after this incident, I went to another store which verified that they would honor the discount on my son’s formula.
I informed the cashier that what she said was not correct and that she should apply the required discount even if she has to override the POS to do it. The cashier called a senior staff to assist her but the senior staff merely told me that she cannot do anything about my concerns nor override the system as shown in the POS screen.
I requested to speak to the manager of the store to get clarification on two things:
1) If the refusal to apply the discount is a company policy based on a new DTI ruling; and
2) If there is an available written policy specifying that milk such as NAN HW Two, is not eligible for a discount.
The manager who spoke to me explained that NAN HW Two is not eligible for the discount because it is “stage milk”. From my understanding of her explanation, “stage milk” is considered as follow-on milk despite the fact that it is prescribed to infants such as my son. Therefore, it appears that it is your store’s policy to exclude follow-on milk that infants require for survival and nutrition from the discount provided to persons with disabilities.
I asked the manager if she is aware that infant formula such as Nan HW Two is included in the list of Basic Necessities under the law. She simply replied that she cannot give me an answer at the moment.
I left your establishment extremely disappointed and, after verifying with another establishment that the discount is applicable on the formula, perplexed about your company’s apparently exclusive decision to exclude “stage milk” from the discounts to PWDs in clear violation of Section 32(j), Chapter 8 of Republic Act No.944, which amends RA No. 7277, otherwise known as the Magna Carta for Disabled Persons and goes against the list found under Section 2(a) of the Joint DTI-DA Administrative Order No.02 Series of 2008 where infant formula is identified distinctly under Basic Necessities.
The law makes no distinction as to whether the infant formula is “stage milk” or not. All infant formulas are covered by the discount.
So this letter simply seeks to ask you to enlighten me as to what legal basis you have to deny PWDs, such as my infant son, of their lawful rights based on your store’s own classification which I do not know to be contained in the law or any of the rules made to implement it. It is hard enough to raise a child but to provide for the special needs of a person with disabilities – medical expenses, therapy sessions, and the emotional and psychological drain on the ones caring for them – is extremely trying. It is, I believe, for this reason that the law was created so that our community shares in caring for them, as it should share in the caring of all children.
Robinsons Supermarket refused to share in that duty on April 9, 2013. I can imagine how other parents such as myself just paid without demanding for the discount because they were simply too tired to raise a fuss. Allow me then to raise a fuss on their behalf. As a parent and a citizen, I feel duty-bound to report your illegal policy to the Department of Trade and Industry. I will also be relaying these events to the Down Syndrome Association of the Philippines to save other parents from the anguish that little shopping trip caused me. We have enough to deal with and boycotting your stores will keep us from dealing with yet another form of discrimination.
I am demanding also a copy of that policy, which your store manager promised to send me. Please email me the policy within the day. If you are implementing it in your stores daily, I am sure you can manage to send out a copy immediately.
Yours sincerely,
Neva Arboleda Santos
A couple of hours after I sent that email, my phone rang. It was Dennis Aquino, the company’s operations manager. He apologized on behalf of the company. Apparently, they are switching over to a new POS and NAN-HW 2 was classified as a non-discountable item by mistake. I asked Mr. Aquino if he can reply to me in writing so that I have proof of their reply.
Dear Ms. Santos,
Thank you very much for bringing this up to my attention.
Please allow me to extend my apologies in behalf of Robinsons Supermarket for whatever inconvenience that you have experienced brought about by the confusion in the coverage of the PWD benefits, particularly with regard the milk NAN HW Two that you were buying for your son.
I wish to assure you that our corporation strictly adheres to all government regulations, local and national alike, in the conduct of its business. The unfortunate incident you experienced was brought about by our efforts in improving our front line system. For your information, we are currently in the process of improving our Point-of-Sale (POS) system to better serve our customers such as yourself and as a result of this, the system must have inadvertently reclassified the product that you were purchasing to another category that resulted in the confusion. Rest assured that we have already addressed this concern immediately.
Moving forward, I will ask our HR Dept. to coordinate with the Down Syndrome Association of the Phil, through Mr. Elmer Lapena and Ms. Agnes Lapena, to conduct training sessions for our store personnel with regard creating awareness for and the proper conduct of servicing persons with disabilities.
Once again, I truly appreciate your taking time in bringing up this important matter to us so that we may be able to serve you better.
Jody Gadia
To which I replied:
Dear Mr. Gadia –
Thank you for taking the time to respond. To be honest, I can’t see any reason for the exclusion in discount unless your company has classified NAN HW Two as being other than milk or formula. I made this observation because the manager on duty gave me the “stage milk” explanation.I believe Agnes Lapena has gotten in touch with you about this so yes let’s move forward from this incident by getting the proper training, education and information to you and your employees.For similar instances in your stores in the future where and how can parents like me seek assistance and clarification?Thank you again for your update and time. As previously stated, however, I hope you understand that the incident still has to be reported to the DTI.
Regards,Neva Santos
To Robinsons’ credit, they resolved the issue right away. I appreciate the fast reply and the quick resolution. A director of DSAPI also got in touch with Mr. Gadia. Apparently the DSAPI, who has been an active partner of SM Malls in providing awareness and trainings on handling PWDs got in touch with Robinsons several years back but it was never pursued. Maybe now’s the time for the company to reconsider?
I have yet to go back to Robinsons Commonwealth after the incident (I bought Noah’s milk at a Mercury Drug near our house) but I did relay what happened to my fellow parents at DSAPI and forwarded them Mr. Gadia’s email address should they encounter similar issues in the future. If there are lessons to be learned here, it’s that one should never be afraid to insist on what they know is right. I’m usually the type of person who would brush things off to avoid inconveniences but when it comes to my kids, hindi to pwede. I need to be strong for them. They need me (and Dan) to stand up for them. I hope that Robinsons takes up DSAPI’s offer to partner for PWD awareness too. They can learn a lot from the association and we can learn a lot from them too. I have volunteered to be a part of the training programs as well. I heard that Mr. Gadia wants to meet me in person and I do hope that opportunity presents itself soon. Until then, I hope our grocery trips will all be uneventful 😉
Cris says
April 18, 2013 at 10:10 amGo go go, Neva!!! 😀
Rone Valles Guerrero says
April 16, 2013 at 10:57 pmGood for you Neva! It is plain and simple they were wrong and someone needed to let them know. I am glad that they responded immediately and positively.
Kaye Catral says
April 16, 2013 at 8:59 pmI’m glad you found a way to contact them directly. Glad it all worked out. You were right to fight for Noah’s rights. I admire your strength.
Maan says
April 16, 2013 at 8:35 pmI’m glad you posted their responses also. Kung iba yan, iiwan lang na nakapaglabas sila ng angst tapos wala nang update. Or wala na sila pakialam kung may explanation yung other party.
Anyway, sana nga no more incidents like this in the future!
Mwahugs to Noah! Ü
mich says
April 16, 2013 at 7:52 pmWalang masama na ipaglaban kung ano ang tama at nararapat,pero ang nangyari ay simpleng hindi pagkakaintindihan lamang,wala sa parte ninyo ang me kagustuhan na mangyari,sadyang hindi siguro na encode ng programmer nila ang presyo ng binibili mong gatas kaya hindi lumalabas na me discount,pero hindi nangunguhulugan na pinagdadamotnila ag discount sa mga PWD lalo na sa iyong anakMinsan hindi kinakailangan ilabas lahat sa blog ang problema porket parte tyo ng media,kinakailangan natin timbangin muna ang mga pangyayari pagidipan ang mga hakbang na gagawin bago tayo magsumigaw…POV lamang walang personalan
Jenny says
April 16, 2013 at 8:44 pmIt is personal kase it is something that happened to her family. hindi lang ito nababasa sa news. DSAPI is lucky to have found a voice in Neva. Kung hindi ito nireklamo, sa tingin mo, may pagbabago bang gagawin ang Robinsons? Buti na lang at may Neva na nagsulat ng letter. At isa pa, kung binasa mo yung last paragraph, matagal nang gusto ng DSAPI na magkaroon ng connection sa Robinsons to give proper information about Down Syndrome. pero hindi matuloy-tuloy. Hopefully, because of this incident, magiging bukas na ang Robinsons.
Rone Valles Guerrero says
April 16, 2013 at 11:06 pmI think Neva did the right thing. She wrote them directly regarding the incident and they respnded properly. She didn’t just rant about it in this post, she did her research and she did what was needed to be done, All sides were presented fairly. thanks to her Robbson’s realized their mistake.
carlaine_c says
April 16, 2013 at 1:18 pmthank you for sharing this and thank you for fighting for our children. God bless
Faye Pachoco-Paras says
April 16, 2013 at 12:07 pmGO Neva! Tough moms make tough kids. At the end of the day, sa atin huhugot ng lakas mga anak natin. So tama lang we stand up for them. 🙂
MondeeBee says
April 15, 2013 at 1:55 pmI’ve been a reader of your blog for some time now, I’m following you at Instagram too. I was also waiting for an update on this since that disturbing post a while back. Noah is so lucky to have a mom like you. A wake-up call from one vigilant mom is all it needed for them to pursue getting in touch with DSAPI. Congratulations for doing that. Wishing you and your family (especially little cutie Noah) all the best! 😉
manilamommy says
April 16, 2013 at 12:33 amthank you mondeebee 🙂 it would not have been possible if not for the support and help of my family and friends too. sa kanila rin ako kumuha ng tapang and also DSAPI for following through.
Abi Mingo says
April 15, 2013 at 9:53 amI was in tears after reading this post. I was actually waiting for your update re this incident. As a mom myself, I feel you. We will really do everything for our kids, no? And I am glad to know that the company is fixing the issue.
manilamommy says
April 16, 2013 at 12:34 amhi abi – yes, to robinsons’ credit ang bilis nila sumagot and they remedied the situation right away. i do hope they partner with DSAPI soon.
myleen says
April 15, 2013 at 9:28 amyou did right and you did well! it’s not about the money, it’s about your rights!
i do hope in the near future, our country will be PWD friendly.
Maybe we should start with public transportation no? (I move / change seats pag may PWD, I taught my son to do the same! )
manilamommy says
April 16, 2013 at 12:36 amhi myleen – yes our public transpo system sucks. the MRT stations na lang and the overpasses are not built to support the differently abled. but we should all start somewhere and giving way to PWDs is a great start 🙂 thanks myleen for teaching your kid that!
Anj says
April 14, 2013 at 11:43 pmWay to go, Neva! I’m proud of you for standing up to fight for Noah’s rights. I’ve always felt that if we, parents, don’t fight for our kids, who will?
I admire SM’s policy on PWDs. I heard that they have regular training sessions/awareness seminars for their security personnel and staff. I wish all malls will follow their lead!
manilamommy says
April 16, 2013 at 12:38 amhi anj – yes DSAPI is a partner org too of SM. although the seminars were triggered by SM’s mishandling of a an adult with special needs before, it’s great to know that positive steps have resulted from a negative experience. sana Robinsons and other companies will follow suit.
Eliza Santiago-Ypon (@PaintersWifePH) says
April 14, 2013 at 11:40 pmGo Neva! If not us, then who else would fight for our kids, right?
manilamommy says
April 16, 2013 at 12:40 amtama muther! sino pa nga ba talaga? salamat sa resbak 😉
Mom-Friday says
April 18, 2013 at 1:25 pmAmen to that! Kung walang mag-co-complain, walang aksyon.
I like what you wrote – it was a very objective and detailed letter, and I am happy that the company addressed your concerns immediately. Wag na sana maulit kahit sa ibang establishment. Education on issues like these is key. 😉